C’mon, everyone that has access to the internet has probably “Googled” themselves at least once.
My “short” name (Brad Wilson), unfortunately, is extremely common, and I’m not going to peruse all 500k+ entries Google found to see where I fall in.
Googling “Bradley Wilson”, however, brings up a reference to my Devhood Public Page (click here) in 15th place. Haven’t touched it since 2002, but I’m sure if I could remember my username and password to go in and update it, I’d get my page rank back up there (doubt to #1 tho, but maybe to the top 10 on the first page?).
“Bradley Everett Wilson” (in quotes) wins the lot, bringing “about 90” entries, all of which are of me, or pages that sourced info from other pages, my imdb.com profile being the main one. It is quite funny to see I’m listed on the “Who’s Dated Who” celebrity listings as having dated the uber famous and beautiful Kimberly Blunck (now Wilson :) in 2002.
So, here are some major sites that have info on me (click ‘em to go to my info):
Devhood
Internet Movie Database
Mission.net
Facebook Public Search Listing
One reason why I’m doing this is so I can update all the info on me found on the web, in case any long lost friend tries to get in contact with me (although Facebook has already reconnected me with quite a few already).
The main reason, however, is to follow the counsel from Elder Ballard about using New Media and putting references to the Gospel and our affiliation with the Church on our blogs and websites, so someone would convict me of being LDS if they Googled me.
If I had endless amounts of time, I’d try to scour the entire web and bring back any reference to me, or info about me, or published by me. People are into figuring out their carbon footprint these days...well, I want to figure out my “WorldWideWeb footprint” (yes, I just coined that, but it wouldn’t surprise me if someone already has before me...better Google it to make sure :)
sitemeter
- January 2009 (1)
- November 2008 (2)
- October 2008 (3)
- August 2008 (11)
Blog Archive
Okay, so I was inspired by a good friend of mine, Todd Hamilton (congrats on the upcoming wedding, by the way!) who had some FaceYourManga avatars up on his Facebook profile of him and his fiance, and a good friend of Jeremiah Udy's (Kevin Rose, founder of digg.com) who had one he did on his pownce.com profile.
Here's what I came up with (I'm hiding my "baldy-locks" - as Olenslager coined it - behind the orange "Wheaties" hat I always wear:)...and thats Bronte Beach in the background (except its winter, hence my blue Sydney Uni jacket). Kim just always looks amazing!
Whaddya think? Sound off in the comments.
“Analog Film Meets Its Match in RED Digital Cinema's Ultrahigh-Res Camera”
Now, I’m not writing the following to “big note” myself in any way, more putting the words to page recounting for myself (and hopefully one day, my posterity), my chance encounters with RED (as they have been so varied and random), as I consider it extremely revolutionary, and a company that is completely changing the landscape of motion picture capture.
When I worked in the Latter-day Saint Motion Picture Studio’s (LDS MPS, located in Provo, Utah, USA, tucked away semi-secretly behind Movies 8 and the Shopko there) camera department with Brian Wilcox, back in 2005, it seemed like the Church’s AudioVisual department was at a crossroads. Brian was in one camp, the stalwart who stood behind all the 16/35mm film cameras and gear (and all the history that went with it), with, what it seemed like at the time, the rest of the entire AV department firmly backed into the video camp (one dude up in the Conference Centre Studio even had a “Film is Dead” poster on his office door), having all come from broadcast backgrounds.
I was intrigued by what I was reading in the industry mags of the day about the new Arri D-20 digital cinema camera (that was to eventually come out at the end of 2005), and what Dalsa had in store with their 4k Origin camera, and how these new digital “video” cameras could take all the film accessories and lenses we already had, and captured RAW images (as close as yer gonna get to capturing film in an electronic environment right now), which allowed you to capture a lot of information initially, and decide on a look in post (similar to grading and post colour correction). Right before the big National Association of Broadcastors (NAB) exhibit in Las Vegas in April 2005, I started compiling all the information I could about the specs of these new digital cinema cameras into an Excel spreadsheet that I passed onto Glen Willardson (the guy we reported to in the camera department...maybe he was head of production??), detailing the pros and cons of each one, mainly so I knew what to look for when I dragged Kimbo down to Vegas that year :)
One of the most technically amazing of all these (I think at the time there was the Origin, Viper, D-20, Genesis maybe??, Panavised F900, and...) was an old, crazy looking guy named Jeff Kreines’ Kinetta Camera (seen here).
Kim and I (and Dustin Olenslager, a missionary companion of mine who lives in Vegas, and who comes to NAB with me every time I go) passed him on the showroom floor, but I honestly can’t recall if I said anything to him (should have tho!).
At that particular NAB we were swept up in Panasonic P2 fever (I had scored some Panny party invites somehow on online that got us into the P2 launch event one of the nights; we also met up with an old workmate of mine, Todd Hamilton, who used to work at BYU’s Technology Assisted Language Learning Group [TALL] with me) and fell in love with the HVX200 (we owned a Panasonic DVX100 at the time, which we ended up selling to help purchase our tickets to Sydney), and digital cinema cameras suddenly took a backseat.
In July 2005, Kim and I were off to Sydney for a masters degree in film at the University of Sydney, and we missed NAB 2006, wherein the Oakley founder and billionaire (and, I’m assuming ex-, Latter-day Saint), Jim Jannard, showed off a prototype RED One camera, which at the time was “not much more than an aluminum box about the size of a loaf of bread” (as the Wired article put it), and spec sheet. At the time, apparently 500 people put down the US$1,000 deposit and secured their place in line. John Bowring, managing director of Lemac Films, my current employer, was one of the first....well, that is until he got distracted, and lost his place in line to the likes of Mike Seymour of FX PHD...and ended up with serial numbers 64 & 65 (still, not too bad).
Kim and I returned to the USA in 2006 and went off to Washington, D.C., to work at National Geographic Television. While there, I befriended the VP over my department (Production Operations), Mike Castro, and went out of my way to create maps of the exhibit halls, lined up booth tours and invite only VIP party registrations, and eventually weaseled my way into a trip to 2007’s NAB on NatGeo’s dime. My initial American Airlines flight never left the tarmac (engine malfunction), so I missed the opening day on Monday (and the schnazzy Apple booth tour I lined up), and didn’t arrive until late Tuesday (when all the awesome SWAG has been depleted around the entire showroom floor - no free t-shirts to increase the size of my wardrobe...to the disdain of Kimberly, who hates when I get free shirts :). The weeks prior to NAB I had been reading the forums and industry sites about the RED and that it was surely to be the must see booth at NAB.
I lined up with Dustin (yup, he was there at NAB 07 with me as well) in the endlessly long line that wrapped around the RED tent (this was on the third day and there was still this much pent up demand), and finally got in to see the short film Peter Jackson (yes, of LOTR trilogy fame) shot on two alpha-prototypes (Boris and Natasha - seen in my Moto RAZR crapcam pix below), called “Crossing the Line”. Completely stunned after seeing the film projected in glorious 4k via the Sony SXRD projector they had, I wandered up to Jim Jannard and handed him my card and said National Geographic would be interested in finding out more. He said “Great, why don’t you speak with Ted...” and pointed me in Ted Schilowitz’ (RED’s Leader of the Rebellion, essentially Jim’s right hand man, and maybe even the technical and marketing brains behind the whole operation) general direction. We exchanged business cards and I told him I would get in contact with him to see what we could set up in our neck of the woods (D.C.).
RED’s logo outside the tent camera setup with video out
“Using Photographs to Enhance Videos of a Static Scene”
Essentially, they have a technique of enhancing video with high res digital still images to enhance sharpness, increase the dynamic range (the range of information from the darkest blacks to the brightest whites in an image), fix problems in a frame, or completely remove objects.
You just need to watch the embedded demo video to “be blown away” (as Ben put it)...and I think you will.
Unfortunately, a couple years later in July 2006, Cleanflicks (and all the various derivations) faced an untimely demise due to a lawsuit signed by some Hollywood heavy weights (but hey, who can say they were sued by the likes of Steven Spielberg and Norman Jewison - of “Fiddler on the Roof” fame??!)
However, the lawsuit didn’t afflict a relatively new upstart company showcased on the Today Show with Matt Lauer (in the USA) called Clearplay, which eventually was protected under the US Congress’ Family Movie Act.
Fast forward to Kim and I living in Washington, DC, and we saw Clearplay on sale in the local Target store. We snatched it up, and fell instantly in love.
Now, Clearplay’s distinguishing feature is that the original DVD is unaltered...its edited on the fly almost instantaneously - as the DVD spins so rapidly, its easy to fast forward thru the naughty bits without so much as a hiccup...really hard to notice most of the time - and the audio can cut out for the foul language just like pressing your mute button on the telly.
Kim and I had to part ways with our beloved Clearplay right before we hopped the plane to Sydney, because at the time, it was an American only operation. Seeing a definite need here in Australia, a quick look at the current specs of the player showed it could handle the 240V/50hz Aussie power, and the PAL television system, so there shouldn’t be too much involved to get it on our shores.
A barrage of emails to every email address I could find for anyone who did anything with Clearplay finally got me in contact with the Clearplay International operation, who, are bringing the goodness of Clearplay to the rest of us.
I quickly got to the point that I wanted to help spearhead the import of this wonderful product to Australia and got a nice response:
Many thanks for your e-mail enquiring about ClearPlay, our colleagues in the US have asked me to respond to you.
ClearPlay International NV is responsible for building the ClearPlay business outside the US and we are interested in working with distribution and marketing partners.
Today, we are focusing expansion planning on those countries where evidence exists that consumers and opinion leaders are actively concerned about ‘objectionable’ content in the entertainment programming that they and their families receive, and where those consumers would be interested in more choice and control. If you have such information, it will help us to evaluate/determine if Australia should be among our first expansion markets.
For your information, we are developing a BluRay version and attached is an overview of ClearPlay Connect, the new application for BluRay players.
Many thanks once again for your interest.
Yours sincerely,
(name removed by me for obvious reasons)So, I’m gonna give it my all and see what I can do to help clean up living rooms Australia-wide.
Will keep you posted...
1.25 cups flour (whole-meal or bleached, doesn’t matter)
1/8 cup caster/powdered sugar
1/8 cup brown sugar
1 tsp baking powder
1 tsp baking soda
1 Tsp cinnamon
1 pinch of salt
1 egg
1.25 cups buttermilk (alt. mix fresh cream and regular milk)
1/4 cup oil (or melted butter if your into that kind o’ stuff)
1 tsp vanilla extract
Not in any particular order, throw all that in and whisk it like crazy till its nice ‘n smooth (the batter should run off the whisk like a thick velvety ribbon.
Cover it and toss it in the fridge for two hours (so the baking soda and powder can do their fancy work).
Heat the pan and spray it down with oil of your choosing. Cook ‘em till they start to get bubbly...c’mon who hasn’t cooked pancakes before. You know the rest.
(If you’re living in Australia we highly recommend Coles Maple flavoured syrup as the best cheap alternative to the real deal. In the USA I love Mrs. Butterworths - but the same stuff did drive my little bro over the edge once, so use sparingly)
If you’re like me, you can’t stand it when people have big high definition television screens connected to their DVD players and digital/HD tuners via ultra thin, el cheap-o analog RCA cables (you know the kind, Yellow for video, Red and White as the stereo pair - the absolute worst is when they only have mono/White connected...but I won’t go there today).
A good friend of mine had a fairly new 65” HD plasma screen, which I felt just wasn’t cutting it as far as picture quality when he was showing it off to me. A bit of investigation and I find the exact scenario laid out above. He had his up-converting, progressive scan capable DVD player AND his HD Comcast cable box connected to two analog RCA ports round the back. Get this tho...he was paying for premium HD cable, and didn’t even know that he had HD channels!!!
A quick trip to Walmart and some HDMI cables later and he was in business. I left the Yellow RCA cable connected and did a little demonstration with his HD comcast box. Tuned into the standard def Fox channel with American Idle (Idol) on via the RCA cable. 4:3 aspect ratio, 480i picture. Not too bad. Jumped up to the HD channel via the digital HDMI connection (it was hidden in the 900s - maybe he didn’t have the patience to go through all the thousand channels he was paying for?) and it completely blew him away. 16:9 and 1080i. You see the audience cheering in the wings (you don’t see that on the SD broadcast because of the 4:3 framing), and on close ups you could see the veins in the contestant’s eyes, and the make-up lines on the host’s face. Flipping back and forth had him sold.
Now this has been a very long winded morality tale, and the moral of the story is: utilize the screen you paid big bucks for with the proper connection! Esp if you paid more than a thousand dollars, a $20 cable from Walmart is nothing (obviously more expensive cables would be best, but at least you have the proper connection that can drive the resolution your new telly is drooling for).
Remember, Yellow/RCA is worst, S-Video is a tad bit better, Component (RGB coloured) RCA is probably the best yer gonna get as far as analog (enables progressive scan), then comes DVI-D, which is great for digital, but I reckon HDMI is best (carries high def picture and digital surround audio down one nice cable).
In trying to become more involved in the Australian film industry, I volunteered to write articles in the Australian Cinematographer Society’s (ACS) magazine, Australian Cinematographer.
Anyway, I wrote some items about new gear and it’s appeared in the 50th Anniversary issue. I’ve got myself a proper printed issue for posterity, but if you’d like to read the bits, you can find the PDF here (probably a snoozer for non-filmies...maybe even a snoozer for, you tell me :):
ACS 50th Mag (PDF #3)
Its found on pages 52 & 53. I wrote the bits about the wireless system, the new Aaton Penelope (which Lemac should have the first in Australia - whenever Aaton works all the kinks out), the Sony PDW700, and the new Sony F35.
So there you go. I’ve been published in print.
If you’ve never seen the Mark Lewis’ classic 1998 documentary film, “Cane Toads: An Unnatural History”, you’re definitely missing out (its absolutely hilarious!), and need to run to your local library or check Netflix and get a copy to watch ASAP.
At Lemac over the past couple months, I’ve had quite a few phone conversations with Mark, and have been working with his camera crew in-house as they gear up for production for his follow-up film, twenty years later, and this time they’re shooting in stereoscopic 3D on two Silicon Imaging SI-2K cameras, and for tight close-ups, shooting on two Iconix 2K POV cameras.
(for the uninitiated, the “2k” in SI-2K represents 2048x1152 resolution - currently televisions that you can buy in a local electronics store mostly top out at 1920x1080. The DCI spec, or the resolution most digital cinemas will be projecting initially is 2048x1080 - but they do have a 4k version for the future - 4096x2160 - a resolution the RED One captures without problem)
I personally don’t like the SI-2K...I mean, the SI-2K Mini by itself attached via GigE to a Macbook Pro running XP via Parallels, maybe...but the body they’ve designed for this camera is complete rubbish. Embedded Windows XP running on some cheap Intel mobo with an HDMI port that maxes out at, like, 640x480 for monitoring??? Bogus in my book. SiliconDVR (the software interface) leaves too much to be desired.
However, the head block is pretty small and offers a nice means of 3D rigging (the Iconix is even easier, obviously because of its size). It also offers an interchangeable optical assembly which supports PL or F- or C-mount lenses. At this point in time it looks like the Cane Toads guys are thinking of sticking with C-mount (since they can share lenses between the SI and the Iconix), but they have two sets of Zeiss MK2 16mm superspeeds on hold just in case.
I was bored today, and perusing Google, stumbled upon this website that had an intriguing theory to present, and some “facts” to back it up. Anyway, I thought I’d post a weblink and let you decide for yourselves what to make of it:
Click Here
If for nothing else, it was cool to read the links to my old stomping grounds (National Geographic) and the BBC about sunken cities, etc.
Feel free to post comments about this. Would love to know what people think about it (if anyone other than Kim and I actually read this....:)
Since Paul Smith got Kim and I hooked on the 1984-94 Granada television production of Sherlock Holmes, starring the fantastic Jeremy Brett, I’ve always had a desire to do a proper film restoration of it (the DVD transfer they’ve done is horrible at best).
Anyway, I’ve sent a letter (via a third party) to one of the producers of the series, June Wyndham-Davies, to see if I can get her on board before I start trying to raise capital. Anyway, here’s the body of the letter I wrote to give you an idea of what I’m trying to accomplish:
A good friend of mine and I are looking into the feasibility of raising the capital necessary (in the multi-millions we can only assume) to do a complete restoration, proper ultra high resolution re-transfer, and color correction of the original camera negatives (if they hopefully still exist and have been stored properly) with the aid of the original cinematographers (if they can be tracked down, and/or are alive).Those original camera negs/prints would be scanned in at a minimum of 4k resolution (4096x2160, essentially 4 times that of full HDTV 1920x1080 lines of resolution), for eventual international re-distribution via HD television/cable and BluRay disc (assuming Granada would be interested in distributing HD versions of the show, which I have no doubt they would), for not only the countless fans already extant, but for a whole new generation of viewers.During this complete restoration process (of not only picture, but sound as well, enhancing the original mix for possible surround sound capabilities), we would also try to restore out-takes, bloopers, and track down as much ‘behind the scenes’ information (pictures, interviews, sound bites, scripts, drawings, etc) and interview as many people involved with the original series to round out a definitive collector’s edition box set of all the original television episodes as well as the feature length episodes in full high definition and surround sound, with extra discs chock full of hours of bonus material to finally complete any fans collection.I’m sure Granada have considered (or will soon consider seeing the open marketability of renewing an old asset like Holmes) doing an HD run of the series, we just want to make sure they’re not going to go the cheap route and just transfer it to HD tape, but do it the justice it deserves (ie a complete restoration going back to the original negatives and prints, as you would any old classic film).I would love to know if you’d like to be a part of this effort. Thank you for any and all help you may offer. I look forward to hearing from you soon.